Market Nerves On Swine Flu Compounded By Stress Test Results
Forex Market Update: Market Nerves On Swine Flu Compounded By Stress Test Results
Risk aversion increased in Asia after reports BOA, Citigroup told to raise capital
HEADLINES JP Mar. Large Retailers’ Sales out at -8.1% vs.-7.8% expected and -8.2% priorJP Mar. Retail Trade out at -3.9% y/y vs. -4.7% expected and -5.8% priorJP Apr. Small Business Confidence out at 30.8 vs. 31.0 expected and 30.4 priorTHEMES TO WATCH - UPCOMING SESSION EU EU’s Kroes speaks (0730) Sweden PPI (0730) Sweden Retail Sales (0730) UK CBI Industrial Trends (1000) GE CPI (—-) US S&P/Case Shiller Home Prices (1300) US Consumer Confidence (1400) US Richmond Fed Manuf. Index (1400)CH SNB’s Roth speaks (1500)EU ECB’s Bini Smaghi speaks (1630)US 2-day FOMC meeting starts
Market Comments
Markets were still on the defensive at the start of the Asian session as the swine flu crisis develops. Risk aversion was at heightened levels but there were signs of bottom-picking in currency markets with some viewing the risk sell-off as overdone and looking for bargains. Hence vulnerable currencies like the AUD, NZD and EUR failed to break new ground to the downside and succumbed to range-trading for most of the session.
There were further developments in US automaker Chrysler’s survival plans ahead of the April 30 deadline as a WSJ article published details of the deal agreed with the UAW. The largest auto union would own a 55% stake in the restructured carmaker, Italy’s Fiat a 35% stake while the US govt and Chrysler’s secured lenders would together own 10%. The deal still needs ratification by Chrysler workers before the deadline but this is seen as a formality. The news is helping Asian bourses into positive territory and pulling US stock futures off early lows.
However, this proved short-lived as a lunchtime article from the WSJ highlighted that the Fed had told BOA and Citigroup that they may need to raise capital based on early results of the stress tests. Capital shortfalls are reported to be huge at BOA but both banks are objecting to the preliminary findings and are planning to respond with detailed rebuttals, according to the article. The prospect of raising additional capital in the current environment is seen as difficult, to say the least, and we saw a knee-jerk sell-off on Asian bourses and a jump in the USD on risk aversion.
Elsewhere, with eyes focused on swine flu, the data releases in Asia had little impact and were mostly overlooked. Nevertheless, Japan retail sales showed a decline for the seventh consecutive month in March, down 1.1% from the previous month on a seasonally-adjusted basis, slightly worse than expected, whereas on an annual basis the numbers made better reading. Although they were down 3.9% y/y, it was better than the -4.9% expected and a better result than the peak of -5.8% seen in February. While the headline numbers continue to be deflated by lower prices, it is noted that a pull-back in consumer spending is also intensifying as unemployment rises amidst the deepening economic downturn. The outlook for consumer spending is decidedly grim, with no near-term meaningful pick-up expected as incomes decline.
The CHF is likely to attract the spotlight today as SNB Chairman Roth speaking in Zurich just as EURCHF hits its lowest level since the SNB intervened to sell CHF on March 12, currently sitting between the 55- and 100-day moving averages. With the SNB unlikely to back away from its earlier commitment to prevent CHF appreciation as long as deflation is a risk, we expect to hear more verbal intervention from Roth but physical intervention may be left until we reach lower levels seen when the last round was initiated. The knee-jerk reaction to such ‘words’ was an immediate weakening of the CHF, but the fall soon peters out. Note there were more CHF negative comments from Swiss finance minister Mertz o/n who said he expects a sharp fall in the economy in 2009, but noted that Swiss banks had ample liquidity.
Later, US data releases concern April Consumer Confidence. The March confidence number was an off-the-charts shocker at 26.0 - compared to a reading of 42 in late 1974, when the US was dealing with a failed president, a lost Vietnam War and the first oil shock in its history. While we may expect a small rebound in confidence as equity averages have come well off their March lows, the sour mood is extraordinary and has to improve sharply for any chance of a broader stabilization in the outlook for US growth.
Prior to that, S&P/CaseShiller Home Prices for February will be released. There is a lot of talk of the “second derivative” in economic weakness showing signs of improvement, that is the rate of worsening is slowing, even if things continue to get worse. This is hardly cause for ebullience, though it is still very important to watch the second derivative and the good old-fashioned absolute price levels to improve to slow the hemorrhaging of public and financial sector balance sheets. Also, the focus has shifted a bit more to commercial real estate now, for which we don’t have a handy index to follow on a monthly basis just yet.
Analysis Disclosure & Disclaimer
SaxBank A/S shall not be responsible for any loss arising from any investment based on any recommendation, forecast or other information herein contained. The contents of this publication should not be construed as an express or implied promise, guarantee or implication by SaxBank that clients will profit from the strategies herein or that losses in connection therewith can or will be limited. Trades in accordance with the recommendations in an analysis, especially leveraged investments such as foreign exchange trading and investment in derivatives, can be very speculative and may result in losses as well as profits, in particular if the conditions mentioned in the analysis dnot occur as anticipated.
SaxBank utilizes financial information providers and information from such providers may form the basis for an analysis. SaxBank accepts nresponsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any information herein contained.
Any recommendations and other comments in SaxBanks analysis derive from objective fundamental macreconomical and company specific calculations, statistical and technical analysis, and subjective general market assessment.
If an analysis contains recommendations tbuy or sell a specific financial instrument, such recommendation should be seen as SaxBanks opinion that the specific instrument will respectively outperform the relevant market or underperform compared tthe market. SaxBanks recommendations should statistically correspond tan even distribution between buy and sell recommendations.
The recommendations may expire promptly due tmarket volatility and in general, SaxBank does not anticipate its recommendations tbe valid more than one month. An analysis will be updated if and only if a market development or other issues relevant tthe analysis render a new analysis on the same topic relevant. SaxBanks analysis does not cover any specific financial product over time but only products which SaxBanks strategy team finds it important tcover at any given point in time.
In order tprevent conflicts of interest, SaxBank has established appropriate business procedures, incl. procedures applicable tresearch and analysis tensure objective research reports. SaxBanks research reports have not been discussed with the parties, e.g. issuers of securities, mentioned in the analysis.
SaxBank is under supervision by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority. SaxBank does not engage in corporate finance activities and accordingly, SaxBanks employees, incl. the persons responsible for an analysis, dnot receive remuneration associated with investment banking transactions.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Comments
No comments yet.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.